The overall approach I decided upon to
address the Bordeaux House produced by Rem Koolhaas is one defined upon a
research and discovery basis. Thus I developed a core conceptual notion which
would interconnect distinctive sub categories of study to expand such a notion
further. The core concept I decided upon discussed architectural prosthetics,
or the contortion of a responders experience and existence through an
architectural form itself. This would be expanded after further research within
the context of the Bordeaux house to consider the emancipation of a responder
and thus the creation of spatial freedom achieved within the architecture
itself.
The first point of study I addressed
concerned the architectural relation between detail elements and the whole form
with regards to the natural surroundings. Thus the port holes provide an
artificial and therefore prosthetic connection between the internal spaces and the
exterior garden. A connection which is subconsciously achieved through the placement
of the holes along common paths of movement and at places of use such as a desk
or bed. This is portrayed within the model below where the skewer lengths and
direction suggest such connections.
Concluding this point of study regarding
the combination of glazing types and detail form, the artificial connection
identified which occurs as a result is evident. A result which stimulates the
psychological perception of spatial freedom within the design, however one
which further stimulates movement, and thus suggests a prosthetic contortion of
the responders experience. Suggested within the image below.
The second point of focus I decided to
focus upon concerned such a psychological relation between internal and
external zones within the Bordeaux House, thus considering such stimulated
movements. Therefore I decided to focus on how such movement is stimulated
through both detail elements and major elements within the design. Identifying
the manner in which the articulation and positioning of major form element such
as walls, provides spatial continuity between spaces providing a psychological
perception of freedom as portrayed through the drawing below.
While, the individual detail elements
such as the port holes provide an inverse influence of the external perception
internally. Thus the void of the inverse perception which defines movement,
more importantly defines the spaces in which interactions occur, as framed by
the major elements including walls. This notion is suggested in the model
below.
The result of considering these major and
detail elements is a suggested range of interaction fields which subsequently
defines the spatial syntax throughout the design concerning stimulated
movement. Thus a spatial syntax which evokes psychological freedom through the
creation of numerous branched pathways and places of interaction which
therefore limits the control the architecture itself has upon the responders. The
spatial syntax is suggested below.
Statement of Concluding –
In concluding this
study I identified that Rem Koolhaas has employed numerous architectural
techniques to define an illusion of freedom within the project in order to
re-define the owner’s instability of life. Thus defining the architecture to
become a prosthetic extension of the human form, where each technique in sense
represents a nerve, which through the architecture becomes a single
prosethetical replacement.












