The overall approach I decided upon to
address the Bordeaux House produced by Rem Koolhaas is one defined upon a
research and discovery basis. Thus I developed a core conceptual notion which
would interconnect distinctive sub categories of study to expand such a notion
further. The core concept I decided upon discussed architectural prosthetics,
or the contortion of a responders experience and existence through an
architectural form itself. This would be expanded after further research within
the context of the Bordeaux house to consider the emancipation of a responder
and thus the creation of spatial freedom achieved within the architecture
itself.
The first point of study I addressed
concerned the architectural relation between detail elements and the whole form
with regards to the natural surroundings. Thus the port holes provide an
artificial and therefore prosthetic connection between the internal spaces and the
exterior garden. A connection which is subconsciously achieved through the placement
of the holes along common paths of movement and at places of use such as a desk
or bed. This is portrayed within the model below where the skewer lengths and
direction suggest such connections.
Expanding this notion of artificial
connections to consider the combination of glazing options used within the
project, identified the use of clear and frosted. A combination which provides
a transitional separation between internal and external spaces as perceived
from the interior. Thus altering the perceiver’s depth of view between the
interior and exterior and therefore the relative connection achieved as
suggested within the following drawing.
Concluding this point of study regarding
the combination of glazing types and detail form, the artificial connection
identified which occurs as a result is evident. A result which stimulates the
psychological perception of spatial freedom within the design, however one
which further stimulates movement, and thus suggests a prosthetic contortion of
the responders experience. Suggested within the image below.
The second point of focus I decided to
focus upon concerned such a psychological relation between internal and
external zones within the Bordeaux House, thus considering such stimulated
movements. Therefore I decided to focus on how such movement is stimulated
through both detail elements and major elements within the design. Identifying
the manner in which the articulation and positioning of major form element such
as walls, provides spatial continuity between spaces providing a psychological
perception of freedom as portrayed through the drawing below.
While, the individual detail elements
such as the port holes provide an inverse influence of the external perception
internally. Thus the void of the inverse perception which defines movement,
more importantly defines the spaces in which interactions occur, as framed by
the major elements including walls. This notion is suggested in the model
below.
The result of considering these major and
detail elements is a suggested range of interaction fields which subsequently
defines the spatial syntax throughout the design concerning stimulated
movement. Thus a spatial syntax which evokes psychological freedom through the
creation of numerous branched pathways and places of interaction which
therefore limits the control the architecture itself has upon the responders. The
spatial syntax is suggested below.
The final point of study I decided to
carry out concerns the blurring of internal and external spaces thus
considering the illusion of freedom. Therefore I produced the model presented
below which provided a simplistic interpretation of the blurring between
internal external spaces over the first floor. Therefore resulting in the
artificial production of external spaces, internally.

Further, I expanded on this blurring of
spaces by considering the spatial syntax, and the relative influence which
occurs between the two. Thus I identified through the mapping of the syntax
over each floor with regards to only the movement, (within the floor, from the
exterior to the interior and a combination of the two), the manner in which the
syntax responds to dictate the connection between the internal and external
spaces with regards to the type of interactions which occur within the space,
or simply whether they are private or public. Thus public spaces are detached from
the exterior through a linear syntax, while public spaces are connected through
a branched syntax. These diagrams are explored below.

While finally I expanded this notion of
the blurring of internal and external space to consider the blurring of
vertical and horizontal spaces about the central lift shaft. Thus identifying
the space defined by the level the lift is on but further examining such to
consider the void which is left, particularly when the lift is motion. Hence we
conclude the void as a result of such defines the illusion of freedom as it
presents a undefined space which is further connected to the exterior
appropriately. The variety of spaces defined internally across the vertical and
horizontal planes are portrayed below.
Statement of Concluding –
In concluding this
study I identified that Rem Koolhaas has employed numerous architectural
techniques to define an illusion of freedom within the project in order to
re-define the owner’s instability of life. Thus defining the architecture to
become a prosthetic extension of the human form, where each technique in sense
represents a nerve, which through the architecture becomes a single
prosethetical replacement.